Author Topic: The FAIL Thread (Read 64074 times)

"When not wasted, (the rice) could result in import savings as high as P10 billion and could feed 4.3 million hungry Filipinos in a year," PhilRice said on its website.

Imagine what we could do/build with P10 billion a year.

friendlyfire · « **Reply #31 on:** July 25, 2012, 03:56:49 PM »

Chinese Aircraft Carrier = Fail
http://rusnavy.com/news/navy/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=13702

[X] · « **Reply #32 on:** July 25, 2012, 10:04:49 PM »

because my US and EMEA counterparts abused our flexi time privileges, management decided to crack the whip. now we are required to strictly abide by the 9a-6pm working hours

schedule fail!

lahar · « **Reply #33 on:** August 30, 2012, 08:58:18 AM »

http://www.rappler.com/nation/11410-sotto-walang-krimen-ng-plagiarism

berdugoh · « **Reply #34 on:** October 31, 2012, 10:24:39 AM »

Fighter shows why you’re supposed to protect yourself at all times

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5VrNznDW9M&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]

kenn · « **Reply #35 on:** November 04, 2012, 07:01:35 PM »

maybe this one is the biggest failure a filipino can do here in ksa... pahirapan na naman sa mga pinoy nito sa pagkuha ng driver's license...

http://www.arabnews.com/riyadh-blast-damage-put-over-sr-300-m

TNT2bluz · « **Reply #36 on:** November 04, 2012, 07:09:35 PM »

What are the findings thus far?

kenn · « **Reply #37 on:** November 04, 2012, 08:27:42 PM »

Quote from: TNT2bluz on November 04, 2012, 07:09:35 PM

What are the findings thus far?

binabalita sa mga news dito... highly inflammable gas daw dala ng tanker...aksidente daw
pero 2-3kms away naramdaman pa yong shockwave at na damage yong 1 poste ng flyover...at yong pinakamalapit na building sa explosion site walang natira...pero yong tanker na sumabog buo pa yong container tank nya...
daming speculations pero talagang filtered yong news na pinapalabas...

TNT2bluz · « **Reply #38 on:** November 04, 2012, 08:48:09 PM »

That's very odd for an explosion of that size to have the primary vessel containing the fuel to still be intact.

How did the tanker crash in the first place?

calvin · « **Reply #39 on:** November 04, 2012, 09:45:46 PM »

Quote from: kenn on November 04, 2012, 08:27:42 PM

Quote from: TNT2bluz on November 04, 2012, 07:09:35 PM
What are the findings thus far?

binabalita sa mga news dito... highly inflammable gas daw dala ng tanker...aksidente daw
pero 2-3kms away naramdaman pa yong shockwave at na damage yong 1 poste ng flyover...at yong pinakamalapit na building sa explosion site walang natira...pero yong tanker na sumabog buo pa yong container tank nya...
daming speculations pero talagang filtered yong news na pinapalabas...

Quote from: TNT2bluz on November 04, 2012, 08:48:09 PM

That's very odd for an explosion of that size to have the primary vessel containing the fuel to still be intact.

How did the tanker crash in the first place?

I can't verify the authenticity of this story but... apparently, tanker didn't crash... it wasn't a traffic accident. If I got my facts straight, the tanker was transferring the highly flammable gas to the building's storage tanks when a leak occurred... the leak unfortunately went unnoticed for quite sometime. So the build up of the flammable gas was enough to level the building when a possible spark triggered the explosion.

The driver of the tanker was held for questioning since he was the one responsible for ensuring a leak-free connection between the storage tanks, hoses, etc.