« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC  (Read 2787 times)

Offline wheelee

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4013
  • Nobody's tomorrow is guaranteed
800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« on: October 25, 2007, 02:07:48 AM »
when overclocking which is more better when used on the M2N32-SLI, assuming they are the same Brand.
Logged

Offline ^_^japol

  • Veterans
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2498
  • sus
    • personal folio site
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2007, 04:14:45 AM »
Pag intel ata timings dont matter much , its more like 1:1 ratio between FSB and ram speed, while AMD likes lower or faster timings.

HTH.
Logged

Offline Louie

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8872
  • Every end is a new beginning
    • PinoyPC
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2007, 05:00:57 PM »
for ddr2 timings don't matter too much
Logged

Offline wheelee

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4013
  • Nobody's tomorrow is guaranteed
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2007, 05:58:21 PM »
really! I never knew that tagal ko ng kasing nawala sa limelight hehehe, maybe i'll get rid of my 675/ 4-4-4-12 & get an 800mhz instead then.
Logged

Offline nmeuvdast8

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 1956
  • I'm back!
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2007, 10:55:36 PM »
go with the 800/5-5-5-12, para mas malaki head room. dont forget to set it at 1:1 ratio!
Logged

Offline Louie

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8872
  • Every end is a new beginning
    • PinoyPC
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2007, 12:42:33 PM »
last time that cas ratings made a big difference was in sdram :)
Logged

Offline wheelee

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4013
  • Nobody's tomorrow is guaranteed
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2016, 01:05:16 PM »
I have no Idea now what this means lol
Logged

Offline bravoexo

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3346
  • PeopleSoft
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2016, 07:06:17 AM »
memory timings still
Logged
i9-9900K, Aorus Z390 Master, Aorus RGB 32Gb DDR4-3200, ASUS ROG Strix 1080 SLI, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500Gb, Samsung 970 Evo 500Gb, Crucial MX100-512Gb SSD, Sandisk Ultra II 960Gb SSD, Crucial BX500 1Tb x2, Sony KDL 43X8500G, GMX 2.1, Lian-Li PC-011 Air, Corsair H150i Pro, Corsair LL-120x6, LG Bluray

Offline Louie

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8872
  • Every end is a new beginning
    • PinoyPC
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #8 on: July 18, 2016, 11:41:57 AM »
Lower is better!
Logged

Offline wheelee

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4013
  • Nobody's tomorrow is guaranteed
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2016, 12:29:52 AM »
with newer systems now does it still matter to adjust these timings or boost the freq?
Logged

Online barurutor

  • Moderators
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3536
  • The Truth Shall Make Ye Fret.
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2016, 01:38:07 AM »
Logged
<insert witty saying or hobby specs here>

Offline wheelee

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4013
  • Nobody's tomorrow is guaranteed
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2016, 01:55:28 AM »
those are old systems
Logged

Offline bravoexo

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 3346
  • PeopleSoft
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2016, 02:09:12 AM »
If you overclock memory (since they're not linked to CPU FSB speed anymore, yes there is still merit to it, but since also, we depend on XMP nowadays, and higher DDR speed often require higher or slacker timings anyway, you have to realize, what setting you choose does a two, four or eight fold effect on memory...  it's not as precise as before, and can't be. )also voltages tweaking too have become less tolerable on the mem side)

Logged
i9-9900K, Aorus Z390 Master, Aorus RGB 32Gb DDR4-3200, ASUS ROG Strix 1080 SLI, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500Gb, Samsung 970 Evo 500Gb, Crucial MX100-512Gb SSD, Sandisk Ultra II 960Gb SSD, Crucial BX500 1Tb x2, Sony KDL 43X8500G, GMX 2.1, Lian-Li PC-011 Air, Corsair H150i Pro, Corsair LL-120x6, LG Bluray

Offline wheelee

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4013
  • Nobody's tomorrow is guaranteed
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2016, 09:15:52 AM »
^ so I guess it's best to leave them alone in their default or Optimum settings now.
do newer mobo now have Optimum turbo settings for mems just like for CPU's?
haven't been tinkering with PC's for the past few years lol 
Logged

Online barurutor

  • Moderators
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3536
  • The Truth Shall Make Ye Fret.
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2016, 09:26:54 AM »
I guess if your modules have XMP use it.
Logged
<insert witty saying or hobby specs here>

Offline splerdu

  • Veterans
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 8023
Re: 800/ 5-5-5-12 or 675/ 4-4-4-12 for OC
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2016, 02:36:37 PM »
Quote from: wheelee on July 19, 2016, 01:55:28 AM
those are old systems
Haswell-E is same platform as the current i7 extreme line, and uses the same new DDR4 so it should still be relevant.

Here's a test for Skylake:
http://www.legitreviews.com/ddr4-memory-scaling-intel-z170-finding-the-best-ddr4-memory-kit-speed_170340/
Logged
fhtagn
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »